Question 1
Read the passage and answer the questions that follow:
When we survey all know human societies, we find everywhere a form of family, some set of permanent arrangement by which males assist females in caring for children while they were young.
The distinctively human aspect of the enterprise lies not in the protection the male affords the females and the young - this we share with primates.
Nor does it lie in the lordly possessiveness of the male over the females for whose favour he contends with other males this too we share with the primates. Its distinctiveness lies instead in the nurturing behaviour of the male who among human beings everywhere help provide food for women and children.
Among our structurally closest analogues - the primates - the male does not feed the female. he may fight to protect her or to possess her, but he does not nurture her.
She has to fend for herself. Somewhere at the dawn of human history some social invention was made under which males started nurturing and their young. In every known human society, everywhere in the world, the young male learns that he is grown up, one of the things which he must do in order to be a full member of society is to provide food for some females and her young.
Even in the simple societies a large number of men may escape burden of feeding females and the young by entering monasteries - and feeding each other - or by entering some profession that their society will classify as giving them a right to be fed, like the army and the navy, or the Buddhist order of Burma. But in spite of such exceptions , every known uman society rests firmly on the learned nurturing behaviour of men.
When we survey all know human societies, we find everywhere a form of family, some set of permanent arrangement by which males assist females in caring for children while they were young.
The distinctively human aspect of the enterprise lies not in the protection the male affords the females and the young - this we share with primates.
Nor does it lie in the lordly possessiveness of the male over the females for whose favour he contends with other males this too we share with the primates. Its distinctiveness lies instead in the nurturing behaviour of the male who among human beings everywhere help provide food for women and children.
Among our structurally closest analogues - the primates - the male does not feed the female. he may fight to protect her or to possess her, but he does not nurture her.
She has to fend for herself. Somewhere at the dawn of human history some social invention was made under which males started nurturing and their young. In every known human society, everywhere in the world, the young male learns that he is grown up, one of the things which he must do in order to be a full member of society is to provide food for some females and her young.
Even in the simple societies a large number of men may escape burden of feeding females and the young by entering monasteries - and feeding each other - or by entering some profession that their society will classify as giving them a right to be fed, like the army and the navy, or the Buddhist order of Burma. But in spite of such exceptions , every known uman society rests firmly on the learned nurturing behaviour of men.
man differs from other animals because
Objective